<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 383 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325199</link>
    <description>The Court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation of two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The meeting of Equity Shareholders was dispensed with due to unanimous consent, with no impact on Secured Creditors. After addressing observations and concerns raised by authorities, the Court approved the Scheme, directing the Transferor Company to preserve records and pay costs to the Official Liquidator. Necessary documents were to be lodged for stamp duty adjudication, and copies of the order were to be filed with relevant authorities. The petitions were disposed of, concluding the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 383 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325199</link>
      <description>The Court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation of two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The meeting of Equity Shareholders was dispensed with due to unanimous consent, with no impact on Secured Creditors. After addressing observations and concerns raised by authorities, the Court approved the Scheme, directing the Transferor Company to preserve records and pay costs to the Official Liquidator. Necessary documents were to be lodged for stamp duty adjudication, and copies of the order were to be filed with relevant authorities. The petitions were disposed of, concluding the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>