<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1116 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 54(1) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the source of funds for the new asset is irrelevant as long as the property is acquired within the specified period. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and concluded that the assessee was entitled to the deduction, emphasizing the importance of meeting the statutory requirements for claiming such deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1116 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 54(1) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the source of funds for the new asset is irrelevant as long as the property is acquired within the specified period. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and concluded that the assessee was entitled to the deduction, emphasizing the importance of meeting the statutory requirements for claiming such deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>