https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179958 The High Court of Delhi noted a conflict between sub-section (11) of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, and Explanation 2 of the same section. The court issued notices to the parties for clarification. Respondent No.2 and respondent No.1 accepted the notice, and notices were to be sent to respondents No.3 and 4. The court directed the filing of counter affidavits within four weeks and rejoinder affidavits within two weeks. The case was scheduled for further proceedings on 09.04.2013. The court allowed proceedings to continue but specified that the adjudication order should not be enforced until further directives were given. en-us Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:45:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179958 The High Court of Delhi noted a conflict between sub-section (11) of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, and Explanation 2 of the same section. The court issued notices to the parties for clarification. Respondent No.2 and respondent No.1 accepted the notice, and notices were to be sent to respondents No.3 and 4. The court directed the filing of counter affidavits within four weeks and rejoinder affidavits within two weeks. The case was scheduled for further proceedings on 09.04.2013. The court allowed proceedings to continue but specified that the adjudication order should not be enforced until further directives were given. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179958