https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179956 Conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC was found unsustainable where the prosecution evidence did not prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The absence of injuries, semen on the prosecutrix's private parts, torn clothes, or hair of the accused on her person, together with the doctor's statement that she was habituated to sexual intercourse, meant the surrounding medical evidence did not support the allegation. The Supreme Court held that the concurrent findings reflected an incorrect appreciation of evidence, granted benefit of doubt, and set aside the convictions, resulting in acquittal. en-us Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179956 Conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC was found unsustainable where the prosecution evidence did not prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The absence of injuries, semen on the prosecutrix's private parts, torn clothes, or hair of the accused on her person, together with the doctor's statement that she was habituated to sexual intercourse, meant the surrounding medical evidence did not support the allegation. The Supreme Court held that the concurrent findings reflected an incorrect appreciation of evidence, granted benefit of doubt, and set aside the convictions, resulting in acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179956