<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 139 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2642</link>
    <description>Dual mode satellite/GSM mobile phones were held to fall within Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. because the decisive feature was their capability to function as GSM cellular phones. Their additional satellite communication capability did not exclude them from the exemption entry when they still answered the description of cellular telephones. On that construction, the customs exemption remained available and denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 139 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2642</link>
      <description>Dual mode satellite/GSM mobile phones were held to fall within Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. because the decisive feature was their capability to function as GSM cellular phones. Their additional satellite communication capability did not exclude them from the exemption entry when they still answered the description of cellular telephones. On that construction, the customs exemption remained available and denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>