<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1007 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals related to penalties for assessment years 2001-02 to 2005-06 and 2006-07, while dismissing the quantum appeal for assessment year 2006-07. Penalties were deleted as income declared in the return filed under Section 153A cannot be subject to concealment penalty. The judgment highlighted the significance of proper evidence and the differentiation between assessment and penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1007 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals related to penalties for assessment years 2001-02 to 2005-06 and 2006-07, while dismissing the quantum appeal for assessment year 2006-07. Penalties were deleted as income declared in the return filed under Section 153A cannot be subject to concealment penalty. The judgment highlighted the significance of proper evidence and the differentiation between assessment and penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>