https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179928 Where parties proceeded before the umpire without objection and consented to enlargement of time, the court could extend the period for making the arbitral award even after expiry, so the plea of functus officio failed and the award was sustained. Interference for error of law on the face of the award was confined to a legal proposition appearing on the award itself or an incorporated document; mere criticism of reasoning was insufficient. As the award, read as a whole, disclosed no reasons or legal propositions and was non-speaking, no ground existed to set it aside, and the award was confirmed with decree, interest and costs. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:21:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179928 Where parties proceeded before the umpire without objection and consented to enlargement of time, the court could extend the period for making the arbitral award even after expiry, so the plea of functus officio failed and the award was sustained. Interference for error of law on the face of the award was confined to a legal proposition appearing on the award itself or an incorporated document; mere criticism of reasoning was insufficient. As the award, read as a whole, disclosed no reasons or legal propositions and was non-speaking, no ground existed to set it aside, and the award was confirmed with decree, interest and costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179928