<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1073 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179927</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad upheld the CIT(A) orders for assessment years 2003-04 to 2007-08, allowing depreciation claimed on a bridge constructed under BOT scheme and deleting disallowance under S.43B for employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund. The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals of the Revenue, finding in favor of the assessee based on agreements with the government, previous Tribunal decisions, and precedents regarding PF contributions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1073 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179927</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad upheld the CIT(A) orders for assessment years 2003-04 to 2007-08, allowing depreciation claimed on a bridge constructed under BOT scheme and deleting disallowance under S.43B for employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund. The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals of the Revenue, finding in favor of the assessee based on agreements with the government, previous Tribunal decisions, and precedents regarding PF contributions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>