<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1039 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of M/s. Saccha Soudha Pedhi by setting aside the confiscation and redemption fines but upheld the differential duty and penalties under Section 114A. The penalty on Shri Shivkumar Raghuveer Goyal was dropped, while the penalties on Shri Ashok Raghuveer Goyal and Shri Bhumish Shah were upheld. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:35:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1039 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of M/s. Saccha Soudha Pedhi by setting aside the confiscation and redemption fines but upheld the differential duty and penalties under Section 114A. The penalty on Shri Shivkumar Raghuveer Goyal was dropped, while the penalties on Shri Ashok Raghuveer Goyal and Shri Bhumish Shah were upheld. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>