<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1136 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Advance Licenses should be treated as valid on the date of ex-bonding of the goods, allowing for a refund without challenging the original assessment. The issue of unjust enrichment was remanded for further examination by the Commissioner (Appeals) within four months, emphasizing the need for a detailed analysis to determine if the duty incidence was passed on to customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:35:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1136 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Advance Licenses should be treated as valid on the date of ex-bonding of the goods, allowing for a refund without challenging the original assessment. The issue of unjust enrichment was remanded for further examination by the Commissioner (Appeals) within four months, emphasizing the need for a detailed analysis to determine if the duty incidence was passed on to customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>