<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 365 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the disallowance of interest on investment in the partnership firm was unjustified as it was made for business exigency and commercial expediency. The Tribunal found that the investment was not solely from borrowed funds, and the profit earned was taxed in the partnership firm&#039;s hands, making Section 14A inapplicable. Consequently, the disallowance of interest was overturned, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:13:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 365 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the disallowance of interest on investment in the partnership firm was unjustified as it was made for business exigency and commercial expediency. The Tribunal found that the investment was not solely from borrowed funds, and the profit earned was taxed in the partnership firm&#039;s hands, making Section 14A inapplicable. Consequently, the disallowance of interest was overturned, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>