<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 361 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325177</link>
    <description>Capital gains on an unregistered transfer of immovable property were to be computed on a legally supportable full value of consideration, and the section 50C issue depended on the relevant statutory position for the assessment year. Where the stamp valuation authority had not adopted a value, the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate under section 55A could be used for the office premises, subject to a further 10% reduction accepted on the assessee&#039;s objection. The Assessing Officer was also required to verify the correct opening book value. The entire addition could not be deleted; instead, the capital-gain addition was sustained only in part and had to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 361 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325177</link>
      <description>Capital gains on an unregistered transfer of immovable property were to be computed on a legally supportable full value of consideration, and the section 50C issue depended on the relevant statutory position for the assessment year. Where the stamp valuation authority had not adopted a value, the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate under section 55A could be used for the office premises, subject to a further 10% reduction accepted on the assessee&#039;s objection. The Assessing Officer was also required to verify the correct opening book value. The entire addition could not be deleted; instead, the capital-gain addition was sustained only in part and had to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>