<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 347 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting the appellants a refund of interest on duty deposit delay under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008. The Tribunal found that the duty was paid within the permissible timeframe considering the operational status of the machines, leading to the conclusion that the interest recovery was not justified. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to the refund, and the appeals were successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2016 00:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 347 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting the appellants a refund of interest on duty deposit delay under the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008. The Tribunal found that the duty was paid within the permissible timeframe considering the operational status of the machines, leading to the conclusion that the interest recovery was not justified. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to the refund, and the appeals were successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>