<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 346 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the Original Authority&#039;s disallowance of Cenvat credit on various items. The decision emphasized the significance of considering the usage and integral role of disputed items in machinery and equipment to determine their eligibility for credit. The Tribunal applied the &quot;user test&quot; and concluded that the disputed items formed an essential part of the overall capital goods used by the appellant, citing precedents and case laws to support their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 346 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the Original Authority&#039;s disallowance of Cenvat credit on various items. The decision emphasized the significance of considering the usage and integral role of disputed items in machinery and equipment to determine their eligibility for credit. The Tribunal applied the &quot;user test&quot; and concluded that the disputed items formed an essential part of the overall capital goods used by the appellant, citing precedents and case laws to support their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>