<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 343 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal for refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit for clearances made to SEZ units. The Tribunal determined that clearances to SEZ should be treated as exports under the SEZ Act, citing the overriding effect of the Act on other laws. By equating clearances to SEZ with exports, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the refund, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 343 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal for refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit for clearances made to SEZ units. The Tribunal determined that clearances to SEZ should be treated as exports under the SEZ Act, citing the overriding effect of the Act on other laws. By equating clearances to SEZ with exports, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the refund, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>