<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 129 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2627</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside penalties imposed on two appellants under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962, as they had not claimed any drawback for exported goods. The tribunal found that the penalty provision did not apply since no drawback was claimed, leading to the appeals being allowed and penalties being revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 129 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2627</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside penalties imposed on two appellants under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962, as they had not claimed any drawback for exported goods. The tribunal found that the penalty provision did not apply since no drawback was claimed, leading to the appeals being allowed and penalties being revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>