<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1149 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179907</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order directing an investigation into alleged anti-competitive practices, emphasizing the CCI&#039;s role in public interest matters. The appellant&#039;s request for police action on a forgery complaint was also dismissed, as a settlement was reached between the parties. However, the court did not record the settlement itself, directing the appellant to submit the settlement memo to the CCI. The CCI was instructed to scrutinize the settlement to ensure it does not perpetuate anti-competitive practices or harm public interest. The writ appeals were disposed of with these directions, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1149 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179907</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order directing an investigation into alleged anti-competitive practices, emphasizing the CCI&#039;s role in public interest matters. The appellant&#039;s request for police action on a forgery complaint was also dismissed, as a settlement was reached between the parties. However, the court did not record the settlement itself, directing the appellant to submit the settlement memo to the CCI. The CCI was instructed to scrutinize the settlement to ensure it does not perpetuate anti-competitive practices or harm public interest. The writ appeals were disposed of with these directions, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>