<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (11) TMI 33 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179901</link>
    <description>Compensation for acquired land must be fixed on market value as of the notification date, using legally relevant evidence and bona fide comparable sales within a reasonable time. Unsupported averaging, selective reliance on sale instances, and extraneous factors such as the acquiring body&#039;s purpose or land suitability are not proper valuation criteria. On the facts, the finding that the building pre-dated the preliminary notification was left undisturbed, the valuation of the low-lying land was upheld because the need for filling and conversion was duly reflected, and the compensation for the remaining land was reduced after correcting the valuation method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (11) TMI 33 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179901</link>
      <description>Compensation for acquired land must be fixed on market value as of the notification date, using legally relevant evidence and bona fide comparable sales within a reasonable time. Unsupported averaging, selective reliance on sale instances, and extraneous factors such as the acquiring body&#039;s purpose or land suitability are not proper valuation criteria. On the facts, the finding that the building pre-dated the preliminary notification was left undisturbed, the valuation of the low-lying land was upheld because the need for filling and conversion was duly reflected, and the compensation for the remaining land was reduced after correcting the valuation method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>