<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (7) TMI 43 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179893</link>
    <description>Rejection of an assessee&#039;s explanation for a cash deposit does not, by itself, justify treating the amount as income from a separate undisclosed source. Where the business income has already been estimated after rejection of the books, the authorities need independent material showing another source of income before making a further addition. In the absence of evidence that the assessee carried on any business other than the disclosed one, an unexplained deposit cannot be added separately over and above the estimated business income. The decision therefore rejects any presumption that unexplained money necessarily arose from a source outside the known business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (7) TMI 43 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179893</link>
      <description>Rejection of an assessee&#039;s explanation for a cash deposit does not, by itself, justify treating the amount as income from a separate undisclosed source. Where the business income has already been estimated after rejection of the books, the authorities need independent material showing another source of income before making a further addition. In the absence of evidence that the assessee carried on any business other than the disclosed one, an unexplained deposit cannot be added separately over and above the estimated business income. The decision therefore rejects any presumption that unexplained money necessarily arose from a source outside the known business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>