<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1195 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, determining that the assessee had acted in good faith and there was no deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars. The appeals by the revenue challenging the cancellation of the penalty were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1195 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, determining that the assessee had acted in good faith and there was no deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars. The appeals by the revenue challenging the cancellation of the penalty were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>