https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179878 Delay of 334 days in filing the civil appeals was not condoned because no sufficient cause was shown, and the Court also found no merit in the appeals themselves. On that basis, the interlocutory applications and the civil appeals were dismissed. The order reflects a strict approach to delay condonation where the explanation for lateness is inadequate and the underlying challenge does not disclose arguable merit. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:26:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179878 Delay of 334 days in filing the civil appeals was not condoned because no sufficient cause was shown, and the Court also found no merit in the appeals themselves. On that basis, the interlocutory applications and the civil appeals were dismissed. The order reflects a strict approach to delay condonation where the explanation for lateness is inadequate and the underlying challenge does not disclose arguable merit. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179878