<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325145</link>
    <description>HC upheld the block assessment treating cash payments for purchase of property as undisclosed income under Sections 158B(b) and 158BB. It relied on the assessee&#039;s clear post-search admission that Rs. 60 lakhs were paid out of undisclosed stock and found no evidence that this statement was involuntary. The AO&#039;s rejection of explanations regarding bank withdrawals, alleged cash sales, and cash contributions from the spouse was affirmed, given absence of corroborative evidence, inconsistencies in timing of withdrawals, and low returned incomes during the block period. The unexplained cash payments, including Rs. 14 lakhs admittedly paid, were rightly taxed as undisclosed income. Appeal was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325145</link>
      <description>HC upheld the block assessment treating cash payments for purchase of property as undisclosed income under Sections 158B(b) and 158BB. It relied on the assessee&#039;s clear post-search admission that Rs. 60 lakhs were paid out of undisclosed stock and found no evidence that this statement was involuntary. The AO&#039;s rejection of explanations regarding bank withdrawals, alleged cash sales, and cash contributions from the spouse was affirmed, given absence of corroborative evidence, inconsistencies in timing of withdrawals, and low returned incomes during the block period. The unexplained cash payments, including Rs. 14 lakhs admittedly paid, were rightly taxed as undisclosed income. Appeal was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>