<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 325 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325141</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the deduction under Section 33AB of the Income Tax Act should be allowed from the total composite income derived from growing and manufacturing tea before applying Rule 8(1) of the Income Tax Rules. This means that the deduction should be applied before apportioning the income into agricultural and business components. The Court&#039;s decision favored the assessee, allowing the appeal and answering the key question in the affirmative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 325 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325141</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the deduction under Section 33AB of the Income Tax Act should be allowed from the total composite income derived from growing and manufacturing tea before applying Rule 8(1) of the Income Tax Rules. This means that the deduction should be applied before apportioning the income into agricultural and business components. The Court&#039;s decision favored the assessee, allowing the appeal and answering the key question in the affirmative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>