<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee that credit card charges are bank charges, not commission, thus no TDS is required under Section 194H. The addition of Rs. 5,30,13,348 made by the AO under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on credit card charges was deleted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee that credit card charges are bank charges, not commission, thus no TDS is required under Section 194H. The addition of Rs. 5,30,13,348 made by the AO under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on credit card charges was deleted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>