https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325124 The appeal was upheld in part, with the Service Tax liability on commission from financial institutions being confirmed. However, the demand on the differential amount retained from RTO registration fees was deemed unsustainable, and penalties were waived due to conflicting decisions on the tax liability issue. The Service Tax liability on RTO registration fees was set aside, and penalties were revoked. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, and the cross objection filed by the Revenue was also addressed. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325124 The appeal was upheld in part, with the Service Tax liability on commission from financial institutions being confirmed. However, the demand on the differential amount retained from RTO registration fees was deemed unsustainable, and penalties were waived due to conflicting decisions on the tax liability issue. The Service Tax liability on RTO registration fees was set aside, and penalties were revoked. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, and the cross objection filed by the Revenue was also addressed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325124