<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 347 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the revenue authorities lacked jurisdiction to demand additional tax from the assessee for short deductions related to specific allowances. As a result, the appeals by the assessee were partially allowed. However, the appeals concerning interest charged under section 201(1A) were dismissed, with the direction to adjust the interest calculation in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 347 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the revenue authorities lacked jurisdiction to demand additional tax from the assessee for short deductions related to specific allowances. As a result, the appeals by the assessee were partially allowed. However, the appeals concerning interest charged under section 201(1A) were dismissed, with the direction to adjust the interest calculation in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>