<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 299 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty, interest, and penalty imposition on the assessee but allowed them the benefit of Section 11AC as they had already paid penalties. The Tribunal ruled that penalizing a partner of a partnership firm separately was unjustified. Penalties on other units&#039; proprietors were set aside, emphasizing no distinction between a proprietor and a proprietorship firm. The judgment provides clarity on duty demand, penalty imposition, and legal interpretations concerning partnership firms and proprietorship units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 299 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty, interest, and penalty imposition on the assessee but allowed them the benefit of Section 11AC as they had already paid penalties. The Tribunal ruled that penalizing a partner of a partnership firm separately was unjustified. Penalties on other units&#039; proprietors were set aside, emphasizing no distinction between a proprietor and a proprietorship firm. The judgment provides clarity on duty demand, penalty imposition, and legal interpretations concerning partnership firms and proprietorship units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>