<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 751 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179863</link>
    <description>Depreciation on land forming part of a building was rejected as covered against the assessee by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view in its own case. Bad debt write-off issues were not finally concluded and were remitted for fresh examination under the Supreme Court&#039;s principles on the distinct operation of bad debt deductions and the statutory conditions for allowance. Disallowance linked to exempt income was restricted to 2% for consistency. A provision for staff welfare fund was disallowed as a mere provision without proof of an approved fund or satisfied deduction conditions. Provision for wage arrears was held allowable only in the year of actual payment, not mere provisioning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 751 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179863</link>
      <description>Depreciation on land forming part of a building was rejected as covered against the assessee by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view in its own case. Bad debt write-off issues were not finally concluded and were remitted for fresh examination under the Supreme Court&#039;s principles on the distinct operation of bad debt deductions and the statutory conditions for allowance. Disallowance linked to exempt income was restricted to 2% for consistency. A provision for staff welfare fund was disallowed as a mere provision without proof of an approved fund or satisfied deduction conditions. Provision for wage arrears was held allowable only in the year of actual payment, not mere provisioning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>