https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2613 The court dismissed the petition seeking refund of encashed amount and return of remaining cheques, alleging coercion in procurement due to duty evasion. The court emphasized the need for evidence to prove coercion, advising the petitioner to file a police complaint if genuinely aggrieved. It was held that relief under Article 226 was not warranted in this case, highlighting the case-specific nature of coercion determinations. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2613 The court dismissed the petition seeking refund of encashed amount and return of remaining cheques, alleging coercion in procurement due to duty evasion. The court emphasized the need for evidence to prove coercion, advising the petitioner to file a police complaint if genuinely aggrieved. It was held that relief under Article 226 was not warranted in this case, highlighting the case-specific nature of coercion determinations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2613