https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179850 Rule 27(2) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965 requires the appellate authority to consider compliance with procedure, whether any procedural lapse caused constitutional violation or failure of justice, whether the disciplinary findings are supported by evidence, and whether the penalty is adequate. An appellate order that addresses only the adequacy of punishment, without recording consideration of procedural compliance and evidentiary support, reflects failure to apply the statutory mind required by the rule and is vitiated for non-compliance. en-us Sun, 14 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:43:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179850 Rule 27(2) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965 requires the appellate authority to consider compliance with procedure, whether any procedural lapse caused constitutional violation or failure of justice, whether the disciplinary findings are supported by evidence, and whether the penalty is adequate. An appellate order that addresses only the adequacy of punishment, without recording consideration of procedural compliance and evidentiary support, reflects failure to apply the statutory mind required by the rule and is vitiated for non-compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 14 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179850