<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2608</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the deletion of penalty for the depreciation claim on the biogas plant, emphasizing a liberal interpretation of &#039;used for the purposes of the business&#039; and the importance of strict construction of penal provisions under the Income Tax Act. The Court supported the Assessee&#039;s explanation for the depreciation claim, stating that it was a plausible interpretation of the law, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2608</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the deletion of penalty for the depreciation claim on the biogas plant, emphasizing a liberal interpretation of &#039;used for the purposes of the business&#039; and the importance of strict construction of penal provisions under the Income Tax Act. The Court supported the Assessee&#039;s explanation for the depreciation claim, stating that it was a plausible interpretation of the law, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>