https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2604 Pre-execution interference with a preventive detention order is confined to narrow exceptions, and a writ court will not ordinarily examine disputed facts or intervene unless the order is shown to be outside power, for a wrong purpose, or otherwise within the recognised exceptional grounds. In the export context discussed, a false declaration of the port of discharge or destination was treated as material because eligibility under the scheme depended on shipment to the Russian Federation, making the misstatement relevant to the legality of export benefits. Ordinary delay in investigation did not, by itself, vitiate the detention order where the grounds were not stale or illusory. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2604 Pre-execution interference with a preventive detention order is confined to narrow exceptions, and a writ court will not ordinarily examine disputed facts or intervene unless the order is shown to be outside power, for a wrong purpose, or otherwise within the recognised exceptional grounds. In the export context discussed, a false declaration of the port of discharge or destination was treated as material because eligibility under the scheme depended on shipment to the Russian Federation, making the misstatement relevant to the legality of export benefits. Ordinary delay in investigation did not, by itself, vitiate the detention order where the grounds were not stale or illusory. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2604