<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 123 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2603</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal was sustained where labour-board records, private production charts, admissions, and electricity consumption together established suppression of production; the duty demand on that basis was upheld. Fictitious purchases and duplicate invoices were also treated as proved where alleged suppliers were non-existent, transporters denied carriage, and recovered invoice books and challans showed use of another firm&#039;s documents; the related demand was upheld. Transport documents and transporter statements likewise supported the inference of removals from the assessee&#039;s premises, and that demand was upheld. Interest and penalty provisions were held to operate prospectively, so pre-introduction interest was set aside, composite penalties required fresh segregation and quantification, and individual penalties were largely sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 123 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2603</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal was sustained where labour-board records, private production charts, admissions, and electricity consumption together established suppression of production; the duty demand on that basis was upheld. Fictitious purchases and duplicate invoices were also treated as proved where alleged suppliers were non-existent, transporters denied carriage, and recovered invoice books and challans showed use of another firm&#039;s documents; the related demand was upheld. Transport documents and transporter statements likewise supported the inference of removals from the assessee&#039;s premises, and that demand was upheld. Interest and penalty provisions were held to operate prospectively, so pre-introduction interest was set aside, composite penalties required fresh segregation and quantification, and individual penalties were largely sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>