<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 283 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325099</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessment orders were barred by time, ruling in favor of the assessee. Due to the orders being beyond the period of limitation, the appeals filed by the revenue challenging the Tribunal&#039;s orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2005-06 were dismissed. The Court did not address other legal issues raised in the appeals as the limitation issue was determinative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 283 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325099</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessment orders were barred by time, ruling in favor of the assessee. Due to the orders being beyond the period of limitation, the appeals filed by the revenue challenging the Tribunal&#039;s orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2005-06 were dismissed. The Court did not address other legal issues raised in the appeals as the limitation issue was determinative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>