<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325096</link>
    <description>Functional comparability under TNMM requires real similarity in service profile and business model, so high-end KPO comparables were excluded for an ITES provider. Corporate club entrance fee was treated as revenue expenditure because it facilitated business operations without creating an enduring capital asset. Branch profit tax paid in the USA was treated as eligible for treaty credit because it was not specifically excluded from the treaty&#039;s tax coverage. Payment for off-the-shelf software was held not to be royalty, as the payer acquired a copyrighted article rather than copyright rights, and no tax deduction obligation arose on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:18:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325096</link>
      <description>Functional comparability under TNMM requires real similarity in service profile and business model, so high-end KPO comparables were excluded for an ITES provider. Corporate club entrance fee was treated as revenue expenditure because it facilitated business operations without creating an enduring capital asset. Branch profit tax paid in the USA was treated as eligible for treaty credit because it was not specifically excluded from the treaty&#039;s tax coverage. Payment for off-the-shelf software was held not to be royalty, as the payer acquired a copyrighted article rather than copyright rights, and no tax deduction obligation arose on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>