<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 276 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325092</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on all grounds raised. The jurisdiction under section 153C was deemed invalid due to the absence of incriminating material, leading to the dismissal of additions made. The lack of corresponding material for the additions and the unverifiable nature of purchases further supported the decision in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed on 29th January 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:18:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 276 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325092</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on all grounds raised. The jurisdiction under section 153C was deemed invalid due to the absence of incriminating material, leading to the dismissal of additions made. The lack of corresponding material for the additions and the unverifiable nature of purchases further supported the decision in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed on 29th January 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>