<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction under section 80-IC on rent income, considering freezing charges as part of the processing activity. The Tribunal emphasized the direct nexus of freezing charges to the industrial undertaking, making it eligible for the deduction. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 28.01.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction under section 80-IC on rent income, considering freezing charges as part of the processing activity. The Tribunal emphasized the direct nexus of freezing charges to the industrial undertaking, making it eligible for the deduction. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 28.01.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>