https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325083 Earlier CESTAT precedent was treated as controlling where the tribunal had relied on its own prior decision in L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. v. CCE and the departmental challenge to that decision had already been dismissed in the higher forum. On that basis, the Court concluded that the present matters should follow the same outcome as the earlier proceedings. The revenue's appeal was dismissed and the assessee's appeals were allowed. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:14:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325083 Earlier CESTAT precedent was treated as controlling where the tribunal had relied on its own prior decision in L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. v. CCE and the departmental challenge to that decision had already been dismissed in the higher forum. On that basis, the Court concluded that the present matters should follow the same outcome as the earlier proceedings. The revenue's appeal was dismissed and the assessee's appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325083