<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325072</link>
    <description>Royalty paid under a technology transfer and supply arrangement was held includible in the assessable value of imported goods because the payment was commercially linked to the imports and operated as a condition of sale. The royalty was calculated by reference to activated ports, continued after the business shifted from domestic manufacture to importing complete cards, and non-payment could lead to termination of supply obligations. On those facts, the payment was not treated as a separate post-import service fee but as part of the import price, and the authorities excluding royalty were found inapplicable. Inclusion in assessable value was upheld under the customs valuation rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325072</link>
      <description>Royalty paid under a technology transfer and supply arrangement was held includible in the assessable value of imported goods because the payment was commercially linked to the imports and operated as a condition of sale. The royalty was calculated by reference to activated ports, continued after the business shifted from domestic manufacture to importing complete cards, and non-payment could lead to termination of supply obligations. On those facts, the payment was not treated as a separate post-import service fee but as part of the import price, and the authorities excluding royalty were found inapplicable. Inclusion in assessable value was upheld under the customs valuation rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>