<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Contract Dismissed Due to Tile Size Mismatch; Valuation Based on Similar, Higher-Value Imports per Bills of Entry.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27895</link>
    <description>Valuation - The rate in the contract would not show whether it is FOB/ CIF basis. It is particularly noted that the certain size of tiles imported by the appellant are not tallied with the contract. Therefore, the contract is discarded and the price of contemporaneous imports at / around the time of import of impugned goods at higher value, as evident from 4 Bills of Entry is adopted - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 21:41:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 21:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Contract Dismissed Due to Tile Size Mismatch; Valuation Based on Similar, Higher-Value Imports per Bills of Entry.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27895</link>
      <description>Valuation - The rate in the contract would not show whether it is FOB/ CIF basis. It is particularly noted that the certain size of tiles imported by the appellant are not tallied with the contract. Therefore, the contract is discarded and the price of contemporaneous imports at / around the time of import of impugned goods at higher value, as evident from 4 Bills of Entry is adopted - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 21:41:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>