<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1160 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179787</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed as the bench ruled in favor of the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under Section 10(26AAB) of the Act, citing retroactive application. The income of the assessees was deemed exempt from tax, leading to the reversal of tax authorities&#039; orders. The stay applications were rejected, and other issues raised were not considered in light of the exemption decision. The Assessing Officer was directed to act in accordance with the bench&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 18:06:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1160 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179787</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed as the bench ruled in favor of the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under Section 10(26AAB) of the Act, citing retroactive application. The income of the assessees was deemed exempt from tax, leading to the reversal of tax authorities&#039; orders. The stay applications were rejected, and other issues raised were not considered in light of the exemption decision. The Assessing Officer was directed to act in accordance with the bench&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>