<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 813 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179777</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the exemption of interest and rental income based on the principle of mutuality for the assessee, a mutual association with cooperative societies as members. The Tribunal instructed a fresh assessment in light of an amendment in the Federation&#039;s constitution, allowing surplus asset distribution among institutional members in liquidation. The judgment emphasized the need for a reasoned decision by the AO after considering the new development and providing the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:49:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 813 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179777</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the exemption of interest and rental income based on the principle of mutuality for the assessee, a mutual association with cooperative societies as members. The Tribunal instructed a fresh assessment in light of an amendment in the Federation&#039;s constitution, allowing surplus asset distribution among institutional members in liquidation. The judgment emphasized the need for a reasoned decision by the AO after considering the new development and providing the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>