https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179774 The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal for the assessment year 2007-08, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete certain additions challenged by the Department. The Tribunal found that the expenses for repair and maintenance, depreciation, and investment-related expenses were correctly accounted for and offered for taxation, based on a previous order in the assessee's own case. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order in its entirety, ruling against the Department's contentions. en-us Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:37:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179774 The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal for the assessment year 2007-08, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete certain additions challenged by the Department. The Tribunal found that the expenses for repair and maintenance, depreciation, and investment-related expenses were correctly accounted for and offered for taxation, based on a previous order in the assessee's own case. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order in its entirety, ruling against the Department's contentions. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179774