<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 966 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179767</link>
    <description>Recovery of a disputed tax demand arising from provisional assessments was held not to be pressed further while the first appeals remained pending, particularly where the taxpayer had already deposited the amount required under an interim order. The Court stayed recovery of the balance amount until disposal of the appeals, finding no justification for continued coercive recovery during the appellate process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 966 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179767</link>
      <description>Recovery of a disputed tax demand arising from provisional assessments was held not to be pressed further while the first appeals remained pending, particularly where the taxpayer had already deposited the amount required under an interim order. The Court stayed recovery of the balance amount until disposal of the appeals, finding no justification for continued coercive recovery during the appellate process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>