<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1100 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179766</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to restrict the addition to Rs. 7,95,160. The Tribunal found the explanations provided by the assessee satisfactory, emphasizing the absence of evidence of cash diversion or artificial cash balances. The decision was based on the peak cash balance during the year, supporting the assessee&#039;s position and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument regarding the use of cash withdrawals for other purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 21:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1100 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179766</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to restrict the addition to Rs. 7,95,160. The Tribunal found the explanations provided by the assessee satisfactory, emphasizing the absence of evidence of cash diversion or artificial cash balances. The decision was based on the peak cash balance during the year, supporting the assessee&#039;s position and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument regarding the use of cash withdrawals for other purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>