<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1051 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the payment claimed by the assessee did not qualify for deduction under section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the payment was voluntary and not wholly and exclusively incurred in connection with the transfer of shares, as required by the law. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1051 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the payment claimed by the assessee did not qualify for deduction under section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the payment was voluntary and not wholly and exclusively incurred in connection with the transfer of shares, as required by the law. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>