<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 247 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325063</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s short term capital gains were classified as income from business trading activity rather than gains from shares held for investment. The courts upheld this decision based on factors such as holding periods and trading frequency, concluding that the shares were traded for profit. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments, the courts found no reason to interfere with the lower authorities&#039; findings, dismissing the appeal without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:26:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 247 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325063</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s short term capital gains were classified as income from business trading activity rather than gains from shares held for investment. The courts upheld this decision based on factors such as holding periods and trading frequency, concluding that the shares were traded for profit. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments, the courts found no reason to interfere with the lower authorities&#039; findings, dismissing the appeal without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>