https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2589 The Tribunal allowed the modification of the final order due to the disposal of goods during the appeal, criticizing the delay in bringing this fact to their attention. They favored redemption of the goods against payment of a fine, directing the adjudicating authority to determine a reasonable redemption fine from the sale proceeds. The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalty, noting the appellant's failure to prove lawful acquisition of the seized goods. They instructed the adjudicating authority to determine the redemption fine, emphasizing the appellant's right to be heard and compliance with relevant provisions. en-us Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2589 The Tribunal allowed the modification of the final order due to the disposal of goods during the appeal, criticizing the delay in bringing this fact to their attention. They favored redemption of the goods against payment of a fine, directing the adjudicating authority to determine a reasonable redemption fine from the sale proceeds. The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalty, noting the appellant's failure to prove lawful acquisition of the seized goods. They instructed the adjudicating authority to determine the redemption fine, emphasizing the appellant's right to be heard and compliance with relevant provisions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2589