<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 237 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325053</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that royalty payments should be considered as revenue expenditure, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment as capital expenditure. Additionally, the ITAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to compute the disallowance based on a 2% ratio of exempt income earned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 237 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325053</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that royalty payments should be considered as revenue expenditure, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment as capital expenditure. Additionally, the ITAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to compute the disallowance based on a 2% ratio of exempt income earned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>