<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that expenses on business club membership qualified as an &quot;input service&quot; eligible for Cenvat Credit under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The decision emphasized the role of club memberships in promoting business activities and aligning with legal precedents, overturning the denial of Cenvat Credit by the Commissioner of Central Excise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that expenses on business club membership qualified as an &quot;input service&quot; eligible for Cenvat Credit under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The decision emphasized the role of club memberships in promoting business activities and aligning with legal precedents, overturning the denial of Cenvat Credit by the Commissioner of Central Excise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>